Twitch: Streamer are treated differently, depending on the reach and awareness
Twitch has become ten years old this year. Once designed as a platform under the name Justin.tv exclusively for live streams of video games, a lot has happened since then. So in 2014, the online Gigant Amazon Twitch took over just under a billion US dollar. Nowadays you will find the streaming provider in addition to Gaming also all sorts other content, such as concerts, traveling or even whole evening shows. Or - again and again controversial - streams of slightly clothed women, for example in bikini in a pool, so-called hot tub streams . That in the course of all this controversial formats streamers are always banned by the platform, therefore is not uncommon. Just for a specified time, sometimes forever. At the same time, all streamers and streamer are treated equally - but that is not the same way as an internal document of Twitch disclosed.
Also interesting: This cosplay of Metroid Heldin Samus Aran is absolutely stunning!
Do Not Ban list exists
Recently, massive data from Twitch was laughed, including the source code of the website and payout amounts to steamer. But not only that, even a suspected five-year-old Do Not Ban list is in the course of its survey. However, according to former Twitch employees, however, it was not important to banish great and rich strong streamers for a bit stupid , especially large and rich strong streamers. That is, according to the DO Bot Ban marked accounts should be considered in more detail in violations, instead of appropriate streamers simply without further research be banned. This means that so marked accounts were not completely protected against a spell - however, different streamers were nevertheless treated unevenly. But there was another list.
Another special list
In addition to Do Not Ban , the documents invoked in the course of the large twitch leaks, as well as a Do Not Ban in Any Circumstances list, so accounts, which should not be banned under any circumstances. However, this list is located, among other things, the co-founder and Twitch CEO Emmett Shear. The fact that his account should never be banned under any circumstances is comprehensible and obvious.
Continue uneven treatment?
According to former Twitch employees, the Do Not Ban list was not a free ticket, but meant an extra treatment and more looking with large and relevant streeaters. Also, if the list is now outdated and allegedly no longer used, but Twitch now relies on automatic systems according to its own specification, there is reason for assuming that not all accounts on the platform continue to be treated equally. For example, the often non-exempting streamer Amouranth may continue to continue after its fifth time-way from the platform, although it is known to regularly exceed the limits of the rules not only, but even exceeds.
Source: Kotaku
From Johannes Gehrling editor 19.10.2021 at 11:45
Comments
Post a Comment